Syndicate and Hague

I can’t help but feel that there is something in the collective atmosphere linking arbitrary things (like astrology) to the candidates, the election, and their poll numbers. I did this in a different way last week, but I’m digging the concept of HuffPollstrology, which mocks polls by combining them with the candidates’ horoscopes, the weather, and internet betting odds on the campaign. By the way, what’s with all the Geminis and Virgos?

In other news, Giuliani gets PWND by the NY Times in their lukewarm endorsement of McCain (the least bad - that’s the gist of it). I danced with glee.

Why, as a New York-based paper, are we not backing Rudolph Giuliani? Why not choose the man we endorsed for re-election in 1997 after a first term in which he showed that a dirty, dangerous, supposedly ungovernable city could become clean, safe and orderly? What about the man who stood fast on Sept. 11, when others, including President Bush, went AWOL?

That man is not running for president.

The real Mr. Giuliani, whom many New Yorkers came to know and mistrust, is a narrow, obsessively secretive, vindictive man who saw no need to limit police power. Racial polarization was as much a legacy of his tenure as the rebirth of Times Square.

Mr. Giuliani’s arrogance and bad judgment are breathtaking. When he claims fiscal prudence, we remember how he ran through surpluses without a thought to the inevitable downturn and bequeathed huge deficits to his successor. He fired Police Commissioner William Bratton, the architect of the drop in crime, because he couldn’t share the limelight. He later gave the job to Bernard Kerik, who has now been indicted on fraud and corruption charges.

The Rudolph Giuliani of 2008 first shamelessly turned the horror of 9/11 into a lucrative business, with a secret client list, then exploited his city’s and the country’s nightmare to promote his presidential campaign.

I’m so glad they called him out on that. It’s about damn time.