Syndicate and Hague

You think they could come up with something original. But, no, Huckabee is following in the tired footsteps of irrational homophobes everywhere. Let’s call it taking the Santorum path.

From an interview on Beliefnet (a religion-oriented website) via TPM:

QUESTIONER: Is it your goal to bring the Constitution into strict conformity with the Bible? Some people would consider that a kind of dangerous undertaking, particularly given the variety of biblical interpretations.

HUCKABEE: Well, I don’t think that’s a radical view to say we’re going to affirm marriage. I think the radical view is to say that we’re going to change the definition of marriage so that it can mean two men, two women, a man and three women, a man and a child, a man and animal. Again, once we change the definition, the door is open to change it again. I think the radical position is to make a change in what’s been historic.

This is too tired a topic to drag on with, but it should be mentioned to bring Huckabee’s extremism into focus.

By the way, my favorite smasher to come out of this is:

1. a politician running for the Republican nomination for president
2. sex with animals

Answer: Huckabeastiality

Ahahahahaha. God that’s funny.